NewsLocal NewsHamilton CountyCincinnati

Actions

'Dysfunction' at City Hall leads to call to return to two-year terms on council

Smitherman also favors switch to strong mayor
Posted: 8:05 PM, Mar 23, 2018
Updated: 2018-03-23 20:05:05-04
Christopher Smitherman

CINCINNATI - City council members used to serve two-year terms, then it was changed to four.

Now, there's a move underway to change it back.

Vice Mayor Christopher Smitherman favors returning to two-year terms for council.

The call comes amid very public disputes between the mayor and council and between the mayor and the city manager. 

Referring to “dysfunction” at City Hall, Smitherman says council members need to keep their attention on the business of running the city. He says having to answer to the voters every two years will force them to do that.

“I think two-year terms really keep us in check about the business of the city because we've got to run in a year-and-a-half,” Smitherman said.

 “The four-year terms were, I think, really good for us, the politicians. I think the four-year terms are good and bad for the public,” Smitherman said. “We've got to go back before the voters and their memories will remember something like this. That's why the two-year terms are important.”

Smitherman also is in favor of changing the city charter and having a strong mayor instead of a city manager. Smtherman is said to be interested in running for mayor in 2021.

 

The four-year council terms began in 2012 and the nine current members were the second group elected in that manner.

Former council member Laure Quinlivan, who led the move to extend the term from two years to four, explained why.

“It makes council more productive and it saves taxpayer money to have an election once every four years instead of two,” Quinlivan said.

Council members and community council leaders say the four-year system isn't perfect, but they wouldn't want to return to two.