In a letter obtained by WCPO — from Brown to Department of Veterans Affairs Deputy Inspector General Linda Halliday — Brown, D-Ohio, requested the agency produce a report addressing the allegations made by more than 30 current and former medical staff members at the Cincinnati facility.
Brown spokeswoman Tamika Turner told WCPO that Brown also plans to “press” VA Secretary Robert McDonald during the agency’s budget hearing, set for Tuesday before the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, on which Brown serves.
“I would ask that your report encompass all the allegations enumerated in the media’s reporting,” Brown wrote, “with special attention on whether there was any degradation in clinical care for veterans due to the reduced medical staff levels.”
The report would accompany an internal investigation already launched by the agency after WCPO/Scripps News Washington Bureau reporters began their probe.
The day following WCPO/Scripps’ initial report, both Brown and fellow U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, called for action. Portman also said he planned to file a similar request with the agency, and other local lawmakers have followed suit.
U.S. Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio — who serves on the House Committee on Veterans Affairs — said the agency’s oversight committee had been looking into whistleblower allegations for “a little while.” He said his office first received complaints from whistleblowers in the summer of 2013.
“There may be hearings,” he said. “We’ll see where this takes us.”
Wenstrup said he believes Cincinnati VA Medical Center Acting Chief of Staff Dr. Barbara Temeck — who sits at the center of the controversy — should be removed from her position while the agency investigates.
“I think when you have a situation like this, it doesn’t do anyone any good to keep the same person in charge until things are cleared up at least,” he said. “That should be a call that maybe the secretary will make, or other administrators within the VA.”
Sources told Scripps reporters that Temeck remains on the job and that she is conducting business as usual.
Officials removed Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Director Jack Hetrick from oversight of the Cincinnati hospital while investigation takes place. Hetrick is also a part of the controversy.
U.S. Rep. Luke Messer, R-Ind., said he was unhappy that the VA was not more forthcoming with information regarding its investigation.
“I was disappointed by how we found out. We got a late afternoon phone call Friday from the VA with very cryptic description (of what was happening),” he said. “Frankly, I think our veterans deserve better.
“We need to get to the bottom of what actually happened there at the VA, and most importantly we need to ensure our veterans’ get access to high quality care.”
Brown said he hopes the report will address the following questions:
Did Mr. Hetrick's relationship with Dr. Temeck pose a conflict of interest and was that why whistleblower concerns went unheeded?
Did Dr. Temeck have the authority to prescribe controlled substances?
Is Dr. Temeck currently registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration to prescribe controlled substances?
Is Dr. Temeck currently authorized by the state of Ohio or any other state to prescribe controlled substances?
Has Dr. Temeck had the authority to prescribe controlled substances at any point during her career? If so, when? What schedules of controlled substances was Dr. Temeck authorized to prescribe, and in what states?
Did Dr. Temeck provide fraudulent information on any prescriptions for controlled substances, such as listing an inactive or false DEA registration number?
Are employees within the Cincinnati VA Medical Center required to have DEA certification to have prescriptive authority for controlled substances?
Did Dr. Temeck's prescription of controlled substances to a non-VA patient break any VA regulations?
Has the Cincinnati VA Medical Center complied with the Office of Inspector General's recommendation regarding the (location) of dirty and clean materials (together) listed in the CAP Review dated February 4, 2015? If so, why does unsanitary surgical equipment remain an issue?
Did a reduction in emergency airway specialists lead to a "close call?" If so, why was this policy not addressed in the emergency airway management section of Report 14-04215-99?
Were any deficiencies identified by the facility when peer reviews or ongoing professional practice evaluation were performed for Dr. Temeck? If so, was there any corrective action taken?