LONDON - The celebrated silk-and-lace bridal gown worn by Queen Victoria offers some clues about what Kate Middleton will wear when she walks down the aisle April 29, even if much has changed since Victoria's low-key wedding in 1840.
Victoria didn't have to get married in front of live TV cameras with thousands of reporters and photographers camped outside. And she tied the knot in a relatively small private chapel, not the cavernous chamber of Westminster Abbey.
That means a small basic dress like Victoria's simply won't do, said Joanna Marschner, senior curator at Britain's Historic Royal Palaces, which takes care of Victoria's gown and other dresses worn by past royal brides.
"The dress has to rise to the occasion," said Marschner. "It has to be big, it has to stand up to the scale of the space and stand up to the scrutiny of all those eyes. It has to carry the day, it has to say something about our time, and it has to be the choice of the bride. She has to be comfortable in it."
Despite intense interest, the identity of Middleton's designer and the style of her dress have remained a closely held secret. Palace officials say Middleton wants to surprise fiance Prince William when she steps out of her Rolls-Royce to cross the Abbey threshold.
Marschner would not make any predictions, except to say that the designer must respect the decorum associated with Westminster Abbey. That means a strapless gown or a plunging neckline are unlikely -- Middleton will probably have to wait for an evening reception at Buckingham Palace if she wants to wear something more revealing.
The only generally accepted guideline is that the designer will be British. Just as Victoria used English lace and silk woven in London to show support for British industry, Middleton faces overwhelming pressure to use a British designer.
Attention has focused on Sarah Burton, creative director at the prominent Alexander McQueen house, Sophie Cranston, the lesser-known founder of the Libelula label or Bruce Oldfield, a prominent favorite of the late Princess Diana.
Cranston's name surfaced this week with press reports naming her as a possible dark horse contender for the most coveted dress commission in years.
"My thought is everyone who has been mentioned is in the running," said Astrid Joss, shopping editor at Brides magazine. "Sophie Cranston has as good a chance as anyone. It's realistic, Kate has worn her pieces. It is understated, she does slim, elegant dresses that suit Kate's style."
Choosing Cranston would be a way for Middleton to champion smaller, less expensive local designers, Joss said.
Victoria also had to make some political choices when assembling her wedding outfit.
Marschner said Victoria made sure to show support for English workers by using lace from the West Country village of Honiton and silk woven in the country.
The cream-colored gown worn by Victoria is so fragile it can only be handled by experts wearing gloves, but it will soon undergo a major conservation treatment so it can be put on public display at Kensington Palace next year.
"Victoria's dress is a watershed in royal fashion history," said Marschner. "Earlier royal brides were pawns used to seal alliances or bring countries together; Victoria married for love, and she kept the dress for sentimental reasons. Her wedding is remembered as a golden day."
She said Victoria's wedding sparked public interest in royal weddings, laying the foundation for the global interest in the 1981 nuptials of Prince Charles and Diana Spencer and the frenzy now over the royal wedding later this month.
In the decades after her wedding, Victoria wore lace that had been detached from the wedding gown for special occasions. She even wore the lace over black dresses after the death of her husband, Prince Albert, to remind people of her love for him.
Rosemary Harden, manager of the Fashion Museum in Bath, hopes Middleton will incorporate some English lace into her gown to keep the tradition going.
"Kate wants it to be a surprise," Harden said. "And I say good luck to her. I think that's lovely."